3 ms·

Hyperloop is an armchair scientist's back of the envelope engineering. Every single one of us is exactly as qualified to shit on the Hyperloop as Musk was to su

Hyperloop is an armchair scientist's back of the envelope engineering. Every single one of us is exactly as qualified to shit on the Hyperloop as Musk was to suggest it. There is no long history of detailed engineering and feasibility studies by thousands of civil and mechanical engineers. This is the first result of any actual serious thought being given (well actually a bunch of college senior projects) and the winning design already apparently had to cut the speeds by a third (which makes it no faster than a train) and has no space for passengers or cargo. Let me repeat that: the first serious proposal is no faster than a train and can't actually be used for transporting anything. Making it, as a suggestion for high speed transport, completely useless.

tod222 11y ago
> Let me repeat that: the first serious proposal is no faster than a train and can't actually be used for transporting anything. Making it, as a suggestion for high speed transport, completely useless. Yes, although this can be handwaved away by saying it's not a full-scale model and the test track is too short for higher speeds. What I find more interesting is that the winning design isn't even true Hyperloop, as the air hockey suspension is replaced by maglev. There's no air intake on the front because magnets are used. The winning design doesn't validate the Hyperloop concept since it replaces a critical element and becomes just a maglev in a tube with a rail. It wouldn't surprise me if the tube disappeared in the next iteration.