If "UN ruling" were binding then it would turn the notion of political asylum irrelevant. Political asylum only makes sense if laws have some sort of limit. And

If "UN ruling" were binding then it would turn the notion of political asylum irrelevant. Political asylum only makes sense if laws have some sort of limit. And I am not looking into Assange's case specifics, but in a more abstract way, in which a bad "UN ruling" should be considered.