3 ms·
I'm actually a bit surprised that Britain didn't raid the Ecuadorian embassy after all these years (at the behest of the US). While we're speculating: Could th
by Kristine1975 11y ago
I'm actually a bit surprised that Britain didn't raid the Ecuadorian embassy after all these years (at the behest of the US).
While we're speculating: Could this mean that the US doesn't want Assange anymore?
- lmm 11y agoIt's not a binary thing. The US will put a certain value on getting Assange and that will determine the extent to which they'd be willing to expend resources (including diplomatic capital) on doing so. I think the value of catching Assange probably dropped a lot post-Snowden though. He's probably more famous, and more importantly he proves that Assange isn't a one-off.
- vidarh 11y agoHaving Assange holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy and letting the Swedish thing stew and continue to tarnish his reputation is probably just as good for them.
- developer2 11y agoDon't be fooled. Both Assange and Snowden would endure the worst treatment a human being can endure if the US had their way. Just because they don't appear to be willing to do everything to get at them does not mean that if these people fell in their lap that they wouldn't commit unspeakable atrocities.