3 ms·
He's not been convicted because he's skipped bail. He may be innocent, in which case he should trust the Swedish courts. His excuse that it's a ruse so the US c
by ascorbic 11y ago
He's not been convicted because he's skipped bail. He may be innocent, in which case he should trust the Swedish courts. His excuse that it's a ruse so the US can take him makes no sense. If the US was so eager to snatch him, why didn't they ever do so in months that he was sitting in a country house in England? And why didn't the US request extradition, when it's so much easier to extradite from the UK than from Sweden?