3 ms·
Was that due to development problems, though? This article claims the nickname comes from the fact that it's a single-engine fighter: http://www.military.com/
by gherkin0 11y ago
Was that due to development problems, though? This article claims the nickname comes from the fact that it's a single-engine fighter:
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,154457,00.html http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,154457,00.html
> The F-16 is known in Air Force circles as the "lawn dart" for its tendency to plunge back to Earth when its single engine flames out, and in most years, engine failure causes more accidents than any other factor.
- greedo 11y agoThe F-16A was a useless fighter; nothing but guns and IR missiles, only useful in good weather. It wasn't until it received a series of upgrades that it became a valuable workhorse. And surprisingly, it became more expensive an heavier in the process.
- neurotech1 11y agoThe F-16 has made a successful engine-out landing before, when the conditions allow. Earlier jets like the F-104 were almost impossible to land engine-out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Puia_yQxir8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Puia_yQxir8 And how many F-14s were lost as a result of single-engine handling performance issues? F-14s have departed from controlled flight after one engine stalls, and entered a flat spin. Yes, the scene in Top Gun was somewhat based on real events. A few F/A-18s have been lost due to issues with single-engine performance. The F/A-18 doesn't have as much issues with asymmetric thrust, single engine flight isn't always possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Virginia_Beach_F/A-18_crash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Virginia_Beach_F/A-18_cra...