That is a patently ridiculous argument. Allowing unlimited money to be spent by corporations produces a distortion orders of magnitude larger than that of unemp

That is a patently ridiculous argument. Allowing unlimited money to be spent by corporations produces a distortion orders of magnitude larger than that of unemployment. Perhaps an unemployed person can have several times the impact of someone with a job (I don't really buy that, but even so). A large corporation, meanwhile, can buy national advertising and have millions of times the impact of an ordinary person. If this is about fairness and equal representation, your position is untenable.