It's the worst example of government where businesses have more of a voice than people, and use their political influence to compel the government to basically

It's the worst example of government where businesses have more of a voice than people, and use their political influence to compel the government to basically act like a gang or the mafia to shut up dissenters. It's really a tiny handful of jerks who say, "yes, it's a good thing that we bash little baby pigs heads in, by grabbing them by the hind legs, and throwing them head first into the ground, when we determine they are non-viable. But we desperately don't want the public to know that's how we get rid of non-viable pigs, because we know the public actually has something of a moral conscience, unlike us, and would stop eating our pigs if they knew this is how it worked. And that's just the beginning." So the question is whether it's the private business that's abridging speech, or if it's the government. If this an extension of defamation law, then it's the former. If it's asking the government to do their own dirty work, then it's the latter. And I think it's the latter.