4 ms·
the result is your learning, if you see no results from failures then you're not a very good employee. but ok, stick with "i was responsible for a failed produ
by SixSigma 11y ago
the result is your learning, if you see no results from failures then you're not a very good employee.
but ok, stick with "i was responsible for a failed product"
- cableshaft 11y agoYeah, I don't say I was responsible for a failed product, and yes of course I learned a ton and saw it as a valuable experience regardless. But as far as I know, most employers don't care too much to see something like "I didn't really help the business make money, but I learned a lot while I was there!" So instead it's more like "Lead team of X people in the development of {{productName}} using {{technology}} for {{platform}} on time and on budget." Which is fine, but it doesn't seem to really fit in with STAR so well, especially the "R = Result" part.
- SixSigma 11y agobut that's a star - on time & on budget are results. still better than just "lead team X"