5 ms·

apparently it worked: https://translate.google.it/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=it&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zeit.de%2Fwissen%2F2016-02%2Fwendelstei

apparently it worked: https://translate.google.it/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=it&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zeit.de%2Fwissen%2F2016-02%2Fwendelstein-7-x-wasserstoff-plasma-greifswald&edit-text= https://translate.google.it/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&pre...

lorenzhs 11y ago
There's an egregious mistranslation in there. In a section where nuclear fusion is compared to fission, the German article reads Das ist ungefährlicher und hinterlässt weniger stark verstrahlten Atommüll the translation is This is dangerous and leaves less severely contaminated nuclear waste whereas it should be This is *less* dangerous and leaves less strongly contaminated nuclear waste The translation completely negated the sentence. The rest is pretty okay-ish.
- bassislife 11y ago
  less dangerous? or "not more" dangerous?
  - captainmuon 11y ago
    literally more non-dangerous
    - Eduard 11y ago
      literally "safer"
      - DasIch 11y ago
        Safer has a connotation of safety whereas ungefährlicher has a connotation of danger. If something that would have killed you before, is less likely to do so now you would call it ungefährlicher or less dangerous but you wouldn't call it safer unless you're intending to be funny.
        _ph_ 11y ago
        Native German here: ungefährlich means "not dangerous" also "safe" or "harmless".
        bassislife 11y ago
        so "=== gefahrlos" ?
        lobster_johnson 11y ago
        Not really a good explanation. Ungefärlich is more like "harmless" in English. Yes, it contains the word "harm", but there's a modifier that inverts its meaning.
  - deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]
  - lorenzhs 11y ago
    it's ambiguous in German as well, but both: a fusion reactor has very little radioactive waste (only the components that get hit by neutrons from the fusion reaction are activated, and hard-to-activate materials are being used there), and it's also less radioactive than the waste produced by a fission reactor.

lorenzhs 11y ago

There's an egregious mistranslation in there. In a section where nuclear fusion is compared to fission, the German article reads Das ist ungefährlicher und hinterlässt weniger stark verstrahlten Atommüll the translation is This is dangerous and leaves less severely contaminated nuclear waste whereas it should be This is *less* dangerous and leaves less strongly contaminated nuclear waste The translation completely negated the sentence. The rest is pretty okay-ish.

bassislife 11y ago
less dangerous? or "not more" dangerous?
- captainmuon 11y ago
  literally more non-dangerous
  - Eduard 11y ago
    literally "safer"
    - DasIch 11y ago
      Safer has a connotation of safety whereas ungefährlicher has a connotation of danger. If something that would have killed you before, is less likely to do so now you would call it ungefährlicher or less dangerous but you wouldn't call it safer unless you're intending to be funny.
      - _ph_ 11y ago
        Native German here: ungefährlich means "not dangerous" also "safe" or "harmless".
        bassislife 11y ago
        so "=== gefahrlos" ?
      - lobster_johnson 11y ago
        Not really a good explanation. Ungefärlich is more like "harmless" in English. Yes, it contains the word "harm", but there's a modifier that inverts its meaning.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- lorenzhs 11y ago
  it's ambiguous in German as well, but both: a fusion reactor has very little radioactive waste (only the components that get hit by neutrons from the fusion reaction are activated, and hard-to-activate materials are being used there), and it's also less radioactive than the waste produced by a fission reactor.