4 ms·
One interesting thing to note is that any copyright analysis using today's acts is possibly wrong :) These tapes predate the most recent major copyright act (t
by DannyBee 11y ago
One interesting thing to note is that any copyright analysis using today's acts is possibly wrong :)
These tapes predate the most recent major copyright act (they were made in 1974, the act was passed in 1976).
For example, among other things (i'm lazy and quoting wikipedia, which is correct in this point):
Under the 1909 Act, federal statutory copyright protection attached to original works only when those works were 1) published and 2) had a notice of copyright affixed.
If no notice of copyright was affixed to a work and the work was "published" in a legal sense, the 1909 Act provided no copyright protection and the work became part of the public domain.
- dnm 11y agoI wonder if his copy has a notice of copyright recorded. If not, and the NFL doesn't have a copy, how can they prove that the notice was affixed during the broadcast?
- DannyBee 11y agoThey may have people able to testify that they did it to all copies, etc, but it will end up a jury question.