>"I'm not sure where you're going with this. Are you just ignoring all of the important reasons the proposed calendar gap couldn't possibly exist, and proposing

>"I'm not sure where you're going with this. Are you just ignoring all of the important reasons the proposed calendar gap couldn't possibly exist, and proposing some way you think it could have happened?" Pretty much. I start to doubt the importance of what I read when it becomes difficult to figure out where/what/when of the underlying data. At that point it seems ok to wildly speculate and see if any testable predictions come out of it. I haven't put forth that much effort at this (it's more of an interesting "waiting for something else to finish" type task), but still find it curious I have had so much difficulty following, or even finding, citations to the original sources.