3 ms·
People don't scan linearly; they recognise the pagination controls as a block. It's much quicker to jump to the end of the pagination block to find the "next" l
by ajanuary 11y ago
People don't scan linearly; they recognise the pagination controls as a block. It's much quicker to jump to the end of the pagination block to find the "next" link than to scan through all of the numbers to find the current page and then find the next page.
Also, you're forgetting about the fact the bottom of the page forms a boundary. If you're pagination is at the bottom of the page it is consistently the same distance from the bottom after you scroll all the way down.
If you have a mousewheel you can take advantage of this on Google. After you click next the first time, leave your cursor in the same position and use the mousewheel to scroll as you scan the results. Once you hit the bottom, the cursor is over the next link and you can just click.
Even if the user isn't advanced enough to use a mousewheel, they can still become familiar with the position of the next link relative to bottom left of the page.