3 ms·
I think it's a nice article. > While I have no formal proof, I postulate that the problem of Artificial Expression is NP-Complete (again, not possible to solve
by radarsat1 11y ago
I think it's a nice article.
> While I have no formal proof, I postulate that the problem of Artificial Expression is NP-Complete (again, not possible to solve using existing techniques).
But this detracts from it, is it is not what NP-Complete means.
Also:
> Be aesthetically pleasing
> Be purely original
I think a good deal of human art does not fit these specifications.
- binarymax 11y agoFirst of all, thanks for reading! I'm glad you enjoyed it. I agree this is not a definition of NP-Complete, but I was writing this with a less technical audience in mind and wrestled with the description. >I think a good deal of human art does not fit these specifications. Absolutely true! When I wrote the article I spent a good deal of time thinking on these cases, and while art definitely covers much more than this, it fits well as a good litmus test.