This is a typical meta response defending the scientific framework rather than looking at the actual content. Sarcasm sometimes jars attention which was my inte

This is a typical meta response defending the scientific framework rather than looking at the actual content. Sarcasm sometimes jars attention which was my intent. The study is doing more harm than good by reversing an effective therapy simply because it is assuming a negative correlation when the symptom (therapy) itself is indicative of the initial state of the individual tending to the more negative outcome which taints the study entirely.