2 ms·
You can't just stash a building and cash it out 40 years later. You would have to maintain it for all that time and it's a huge liability. By the end of the day
by DenisM 17y ago
You can't just stash a building and cash it out 40 years later. You would have to maintain it for all that time and it's a huge liability. By the end of the day the building will be much worse than the ones being built at that time, really the only value of it will be the land is stands on. Any value in the building itself will come from recent renovations, not 40 yo investment. Thus the building is not a savings mechanism. The land may be, though.
Even then only if population continues to rise - if population drops as it does in almost all developed countries your land will be worth a lot less. Imagine a world where there are 1000 old people who can't work but own land, and then there are 100 young who can work and need a place to live. The first 100 buildings will sell/rent for some amount of food, the remaining 900 old people will die of starvation because there is nothing they can offer to the young in exchange for food.
- gridspy 17y agoThis is exactly why you invest your money into a string of growing companies or lend it temporarily to young families buying their first house. Of course, that mechanism is in trouble the minute the market starts to contract or collapse.