5 ms·

True! A few months ago I wanted to install Aperture on a new laptop; since it's been pulled from the App store I couldn't find it anymore, and this is what cust

by paozac 11y ago

True! A few months ago I wanted to install Aperture on a new laptop; since it's been pulled from the App store I couldn't find it anymore, and this is what customer support told me: I've reviewed your request, but as much I would like to restore the item for you, I won't be able to download "Aperture" to your account because the amount of time that has passed since this purchase was made prohibits us from restoring it. Goodbye App store.

coldtea 11y ago
Well, unless you just want to install Aperture to export stuff out, that's for the best. Aperture has been EOLed -- it's not advisable to install it even if you could, as you'd be installing deprecated software that can stop working at any future OS update. That wouldn't be much different than any software company not allowing you to download their old program anymore.
- brazzledazzle 11y ago
  Not quite the same. At least you'd have the option to run the old software in a virtual machine or on an old spare piece of hardware.
- mintplant 11y ago
  It should be up to the buyer whether or not they choose to take that risk, not to the seller to paternalistically make that decision for them.
  - coldtea 11y ago
    Errr, isn't traditionally the seller that decides, if, when and for how long they want to sell their wares?
    - lhc- 11y ago
      But in this case, the buyer already purchased the product.
      - st3v3r 11y ago
        And lost it, and was looking for a replacement.
        r-w 11y ago
        > I wanted to install Aperture on a new laptop; since it's been pulled from the App store I couldn't find it anymore i.e., bought a license and installed the application, but wasn’t given a legal way to do the exact same thing on another computer—one of the rights Apple grants to users of the App Store; nothing lost, no replacement needed
oxryly1 11y ago
It's this kind of stuff that has me boggled that they charge the same prices for apps in the store vs. apps on media or downloaded directly. Tha app store version is more conventient, maybe, but fundamentally less featured. I'm essentially buying just a license, not the app itself.

by paozac 11y ago

coldtea 11y ago

Well, unless you just want to install Aperture to export stuff out, that's for the best. Aperture has been EOLed -- it's not advisable to install it even if you could, as you'd be installing deprecated software that can stop working at any future OS update. That wouldn't be much different than any software company not allowing you to download their old program anymore.

brazzledazzle 11y ago
Not quite the same. At least you'd have the option to run the old software in a virtual machine or on an old spare piece of hardware.
mintplant 11y ago
It should be up to the buyer whether or not they choose to take that risk, not to the seller to paternalistically make that decision for them.
- coldtea 11y ago
  Errr, isn't traditionally the seller that decides, if, when and for how long they want to sell their wares?
  - lhc- 11y ago
    But in this case, the buyer already purchased the product.
    - st3v3r 11y ago
      And lost it, and was looking for a replacement.
      - r-w 11y ago
        > I wanted to install Aperture on a new laptop; since it's been pulled from the App store I couldn't find it anymore i.e., bought a license and installed the application, but wasn’t given a legal way to do the exact same thing on another computer—one of the rights Apple grants to users of the App Store; nothing lost, no replacement needed

oxryly1 11y ago

It's this kind of stuff that has me boggled that they charge the same prices for apps in the store vs. apps on media or downloaded directly. Tha app store version is more conventient, maybe, but fundamentally less featured. I'm essentially buying just a license, not the app itself.