4 ms·
The points you are missing are 2003 and Celeron. Efficient and easy virtualization is relatively recent.
by KC8ZKF 11y ago
The points you are missing are 2003 and Celeron. Efficient and easy virtualization is relatively recent.
- thrownaway2424 11y agoVMWare Workstation was already on its 4th major release by 2003.
- mattdotc 11y agoWhich wasn't really free if I remember correctly. You had to buy or crack it. Also, I don't think the performance really compared on consumer desktop hardware. As annoying as dual-booting was, it was the way all of my hobbyist friends and I preferred back then. edit: grammar
- dsp1234 11y agoHardware virtualization for intel/amd processors did not come until 2006. So you could run VMWare and get decent performance with paravirtualized drivers, but running a completely different OS would have required software virtualization, and it was not fast by any means. Booting to the other operating system was a much better experience since the OS would then have full use of the resources without software virtualization being in the way.
- wang_li 11y agoSoftware only virtualization was faster than the first generation of hardware supported virtualization. See page 7. of this document: http://www.vmware.com/pdf/asplos235_adams.pdf http://www.vmware.com/pdf/asplos235_adams.pdf
- thrownaway2424 11y agoIndeed. It is quite amazing how history is being revised here. Software virtualization was extremely useful from day 1.