I wonder if this is not a concern with high quality rebuttals but with poor, fast analysis conducted with an agenda. The worry that some people will root throug

I wonder if this is not a concern with high quality rebuttals but with poor, fast analysis conducted with an agenda. The worry that some people will root through the data to find any small issues and blow them far out of proportion. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I think it's possible that's more what they're talking about. Rather than, say, a lab coming back and saying "we analysed the BICEP data carefully and found the results are possibly the result of dust".