4 ms·
I wrote a reasoned, but critical, response to this guy and he edited my Disqus response with a childish personal attack before approving it. He justified it by
by Tiquor 11y ago
I wrote a reasoned, but critical, response to this guy and he edited my Disqus response with a childish personal attack before approving it. He justified it by saying my Disqus post history was about gaming and telling people they were overreacting. Take from that what you will.
- glogla 11y agoCan you tell us more about what you wrote and what was edited? If the author is lying, it should be brought to light.
- brohee 11y agoI suggest you read http://www.examiner.com/article/wikipedia-s-new-editing-software-gets-failing-grade http://www.examiner.com/article/wikipedia-s-new-editing-soft... (especially from "His name is Oliver Keyes"). Our herald of sensitivity was previously known for outburst like [12:19:35 A] <Sophiie> hi, can a page be undeleted just to see what it once was? [12:19:47 A] <Ironholds> Sophiie, fuck off and die [12:19:50 A] <Ironholds> thank you TBH, he looks more and more like a troll, and pretty talented at shit stirring. And removing people like that from your projects is best done early.
- glogla 11y agoAh, yeah. I understand perfectly why the decision "we're better of without you, bye" took like ten minutes.
- Tiquor 11y agoI basically said that the concept of "giving head" had transcended a particular gendered relationship. In other words it had moved far beyond just being about a women giving head and that it was just about human sexuality at this point. I said his stance on the phrase was behind the times. It wasn't exclusionary, it was sexual and I think those are important to distinguish. He edited my post to say I only cared about telling people they were overreacting and talking about games. I own a company in the video game industry. What do you think my Disqus history will have in it?