3 ms·
The "with dynamic memory" part being critical, since that means no asm.js. With asm.js, emscripten is faster. I get the feeling this is one the one hand prett
by emn13 11y ago
The "with dynamic memory" part being critical, since that means no asm.js. With asm.js, emscripten is faster.
I get the feeling this is one the one hand pretty cool, but on the other hand poorly timed. Unless WebAssembly never arrives or arrives really late, there's going to be a way to run almost-native code with dynamic memory allocation fairly soon. So it's likely this will soon be relegated to "old-android support".
- rl3 11y agoThe progress being made on WebAssembly so far is impressive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W7NkofUtAw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W7NkofUtAw