There's no need to refer people to lesswrong for this. The interpretation of probability as a subjective degree of knowledge/evidence is well-known. For example

There's no need to refer people to lesswrong for this. The interpretation of probability as a subjective degree of knowledge/evidence is well-known. For example: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ or http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-bayesian/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-bayesian/ No need to spam links to that cult site.