3 ms·
I don't know about that. Even if we're talking about a large sample size, can we really say "that probability is vanishingly small"? It's kind of like saying, "
by Chathamization 11y ago
I don't know about that. Even if we're talking about a large sample size, can we really say "that probability is vanishingly small"? It's kind of like saying, "Sure, I don't see any reason why someone would build an underwater city, but with a couple hundred countries in the world, and 7 billion people, the probability that no one is going to do that is tiny."
But are we even dealing with a large sample size? Maybe there's "only" been several dozen large interstellar civilizations out there, and a few hundred small ones that never really got far beyond a handful of planets. Or maybe there were a couple of attempts, but they failed horribly. The problem with the "paradox" is that there seems to be a huge number of possible answers. It ends up being "how come this one scenario I'm thinking about hasn't happened."
- pklausler 11y agoThinking about this paradox in terms of probabilities: P(probes) = 1 - (1 - P(a civ can launch a probe)) ^ N(civ) If we don't see probes, and if we don't think P(can launch) is exactly zero, then N(civ) just has to be small. EDIT: HN deleted my Fortran-style exponentiation.