3 ms·
It's hardly a walled garden when you can take your entire repo (including commit history etc.) and go to another provider or go with your own git server.
by adamors 11y ago
It's hardly a walled garden when you can take your entire repo (including commit history etc.) and go to another provider or go with your own git server.
- mbrock 11y agoSure it is. How do you get your issues and wiki into another Git server?
- TeMPOraL 11y agoWiki is something you should have a local copy of. That said, GitHub wikis are just git repositories. You can clone them like this: https://help.github.com/articles/adding-and-editing-wiki-pages-locally/ https://help.github.com/articles/adding-and-editing-wiki-pag... As for issues, it's only a little bit trickier - you'll have to use GitHub API, like this: https://api.github.com/repos/hotsh/rstat.us/issues https://api.github.com/repos/hotsh/rstat.us/issues (from https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-export-backup-GitHub-issues https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-export-backup-GitHub-issues)
- mbrock 11y agoI didn't know that. You still have the problem of mapping the user authentication though. Moving a big repository and giving users the right permissions seems pretty tricky. Do you know of any successful migrations away from GitHub?
- Lawtonfogle 11y agoReminds me of the study that longer return periods are correlated with lower rates of return. Give a method that, in a simple logical view would encourage one outcome, but when you add in the complexities of humans, results in the opposite behavior.
- st3v3r 11y agoRepo, maybe. What about the issues in the issue tracker?