4 ms·
That's a horrible site on mobile... it tries to do some weird app loading thing, wants to consume additional local storage while a percentage counter slowly cli
by biot 11y ago
That's a horrible site on mobile... it tries to do some weird app loading thing, wants to consume additional local storage while a percentage counter slowly climbs one percent per second with no content visible.
Better link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3425972/China-company-accused-fleecing-investors-7-6-billion.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3425972/China-co...
- lowmagnet 11y agoOr, with less tabloid sidebar (now with 100 less celebrity gossip boxes): https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/china-company-accused-of-fleecing-investors-of-76-billion/2016/02/01/e7583394-c8a2-11e5-b9ab-26591104bb19_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/china-comp...
- yuncun 11y agoFirst time I've ever seen Daily Mail cited as 'better link'
- biot 11y agoYeah, I know... but in this case it's almost infinitely better. There were others but Daily Mail had a few more images included in the article, and since the content is from Associated Press anyways I didn't think people would mind. However, my comment stands at -3 so lesson learned: everyone hates the Daily Mail site. :)