Not interested in flamewar at all. My point is that people (the public) don't actually understand the extent and implications of network monitoring, and almost

Not interested in flamewar at all. My point is that people (the public) don't actually understand the extent and implications of network monitoring, and almost no one is speaking out about it. As an example consider that there are folks on this very thread asking about whether or not https is "safe" on a network which is owned by someone else. If there is a lack of knowledge _HERE_, imagine what the situation is for everyone else who doesn't even know what a MITM "attack" is. You can't "protect yourself" if you don't know what the threat is. I am glad that the UC community is raising a stink about this.