4 ms·
And another ad hominem from you... Thankfully I've never had any (positive or negative) encounter with psychiatry and neither has anyone I like so unlike you,
by da1 11y ago
And another ad hominem from you...
Thankfully I've never had any (positive or negative) encounter with psychiatry and neither has anyone I like so unlike you, I'm not biased.
Your comment is a very common technique which consists in dismissing reasonable criticism by implying that the commenter is somewhat broken.
In reality you are the one that is broken by your own admission. You're incapable of living your life without resorting to pseudo-scientific fields.
100 or 200 years ago you would be here defending your exorcist and how without his benevolent influence you would be unable to live a decent life.
- autoreleasepool 11y ago> In reality you are the one that is broken wow. > pseudo-scientific It's a young scientific field that has been hurt by cultural distrust and misinformation. It hasn't helped that people like you have been spreading FUD. The efficacy for SSRI's treating OCD is about 50%. There is on going research for better second line treatments. I'm lucky in that it's been very effective for me. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181958/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181958/ EDIT: You lost all legitimacy when you called me "broken". You're disgusting and I'm done responding to you.
- da1 11y ago>It's a young scientific field that has been hurt by cultural distrust and misinformation. It has been hurt by its own history of systemic and deliberate abuse. No need for misinformation unlike what you're engaging with your proselytizing here.