5 ms·
Looks super cool and very useful. If anyone thinks that $25 or $50 is expensive for 3 installs, they are just being disingenuous. That's less than most devs cha
by flexie 11y ago
Looks super cool and very useful. If anyone thinks that $25 or $50 is expensive for 3 installs, they are just being disingenuous. That's less than most devs charge their clients per hour and tools like this easily save a few hours on each project.
And good to see another Bulgarian venture :-)
- avighnay 11y ago$50 is nothing for such a tool for a one time payment! Even at that price it is very difficult for the tool to make a profitable full time business model. I want to also add that the 50% discount is not a helpful message either. I always ask my team, how is that as developers we always want free software but yet want a salary hike every year as a software programmer!
- SeeDave 11y ago>I always ask my team, how is that as developers we always want free software but yet want a salary hike every year as a software programmer! A lot of people are short-sighted and self-centered. It's completely and totally rational to buy this product if you're billing at $75/hr and this tool saves you 10+ hours that you couldn't justify billing. Some people just don't "get it" - that you must produce something of value before you can consume, and that every exchange must leave everyone better off. This is what used to upset me about the software pirates, torrenters, etc. It'll all catch up in the end though, so no need to over-analyze people like this.
- true_religion 11y agoI think a lot of people are not billing 75/hour or billing at all. When you're at work, you typically just have to use the tools the rest of the team does. Then when you are at home, working on a side project... it's essentially a hobby and saving time in a hobby is just a 'nice to have'.
- kuschku 11y agoWell, the $50 is low for someone who’s going to use it professionally, but if you just want to make one or two sites (and never use it again afterwards), it’s probably a bit too expensive.
- mhurron 11y agoI agree. At $50 I wouldn't buy it as I just use javascript/make websites for myself. It's probably a steal if you do this professionally, or even more often than I do. The 50% off on the other hand brings it down to where I'm willing to pay for it. So I did.
- milankragujevic 11y agoWell, to be honest, it might be. I myself would never pay so much for software because I have better things to pay, like electricity, water, internet, etc. I'm not saying you should not pay for software, but poor people, even more poor under-18 developers, don't really have the conditions to pay for such things.
- oneeyedpigeon 11y agoSure, I think the OP was talking about people who earn the price of this tool in an hour or two, not people who aren't even working. Software pricing is a very strange beast. It seems to vary so widely, with not always a very obvious price/quality connection. And over time, it doesn't seem to follow any reasonable expectation; I paid £65 for a game 25 years ago, which would be over £90 in today's money.
- hex13 11y agoUhm... Usually I'm buying games on steam for 5-15 euros. There is a lot cheap special offers...
- assocguilt 11y agoWhat has that got to do with anything? If I see a game I want on Steam and I want it now, should I not buy it because it's not part of a sale?
- hex13 11y agojust saying... ;)
- sumedh 11y agoThey are cheap for a reason, steam is popular so lot of people will buy the game at that price point. The creator of this software will see a one time bump because of HN but I doubt he will get a steady stream of income at least initially. In the end everyone has to put food on the table.