You made an entirely different point. > These aren't better than silicon, but they probably will be close enough shortly. If you had said: > The point isn't

You made an entirely different point. > These aren't better than silicon, but they probably will be close enough shortly. If you had said: > The point isn't to replace silicon transistors. It's to create a completely separate market at a different volume point. We would have no disagreement. You changed your initial entire statement.