4 ms·
It was Ektachrome, E-3 process. All in all 36 mp of actual detail from those photos might be a bit optimistic, considering the harsh conditions (note that moder
by frostburg 11y ago
It was Ektachrome, E-3 process. All in all 36 mp of actual detail from those photos might be a bit optimistic, considering the harsh conditions (note that modern 36mp digital cameras don't reach 36mp of actual detail either, for various reasons, first of all bayer interpolation), but on second look these new ones are crummy. The amount of chroma noise is startling.