3 ms·
The title is much clearer now. However, the need for such adjustments sort of support the argument that the orignal JADE trademark needs to be enforced in order
by jpambrun 11y ago
The title is much clearer now. However, the need for such adjustments sort of support the argument that the orignal JADE trademark needs to be enforced in order to prevent confusion.
- niftylettuce 11y agoSee https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11004716 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11004716, hope they try to enforce that.
- jpambrun 11y agoI saw what you did. I don't think it is particularly productive nor mature. Aside from that, I don't care enough about either JADEs to contribute further to the debate. Edit: I meant productive in the context of the current litigation. I am not supporting any side in this argument. I am, however, supporting the right of the JADE company to try to enforce their trademarks.
- niftylettuce 11y agoIt took 1 hour of my day to stand up for something. It was very productive, reminded me of how to setup CNAME's and domains very quickly for MVP's, and I made a lot of people laugh (and reckon that they too shouldn't give in to unenforcable nonsense like this, especially with trademarks that are ABANDONED). 2000+ NPM packages, 100's of blog posts, tons of references, and all this was going on for years. Are you really supporting these people? This isn't a debate, it's pure hilarity :).