There have been revolutions that involved zero guns. The most vital part was people, not guns. My Glock still cannot offer the protection from "those in power"

There have been revolutions that involved zero guns. The most vital part was people, not guns. My Glock still cannot offer the protection from "those in power" that many seem to think. 12 unarmed people could easily take my house over even if I was armed with my Glock. Anyway, I think a revolution is a separate topic, but I could be wrong. There are many steps between government overreach & the people starting a revolution. Edit: The quote by Patton comes to mind: "Wars may be fought with weapons, but they are won by men. It is the spirit of the men who follow and of the man who leads that gains the victory."