2 ms·

> I mean, I assuming that people aren't all purchasing agricultural parts, fishing gear, and other exempt categories of items -- is if the imported goods are be

> I mean, I assuming that people aren't all purchasing agricultural parts, fishing gear, and other exempt categories of items -- is if the imported goods are being misrepresented as personal use items. Yeah, not so much anything in those categories. " So far, people have been using Shypmate for shoes, weaves, iPhones, laptops, jewelry and other products." You know that part where I said, somebody is going to see the inside of an African jail cell.... If you keep this up, I bet you are going to see the insides of some American jail cells too, as you are either party to illegal acts or encourage/facilitate such. IANAL, so YMMV, but you have been warned.

dang 11y ago
Ok, you've made your point repeatedly. In fact, you've posted 17 comments in this thread. That's over the top, even without the overheated rhetoric, so please stop.
- amazon_not 11y ago
  Is there some particular point to tell me to stop hours after I've stopped posting? Yes, I've posted 17 comments. Each comment has been original, on topic, with a point and I've several times been thanked by the founders for raising important issues. What's the problem with being active and engaged? How on earth can that be considered over the top? I have no dog in this fight, but I'm genuinely worried something bad will happen if they continue. I'm not even alone in this point of view. Several other posters have noted the same. As to rhetoric, which part do you consider overheated, and more importantly, wrong?
  - dang 11y ago
    By overheated rhetoric I meant stuff like this: "Please stop before somebody gets hurt." "If you keep this up, I bet you are going to see the insides of some American jail cells too" "you have been warned" "your whole setup has enough holes to drive a truck full of C4 through" Active and engaged is great, but I think you crossed the line (a bit) into hounding. You repeated yourself, became shrill, and seemed uncharitably to assume that no one had thought of any legal issues before your comments appeared. The founders were admirably polite and focused on the substantive aspects of what you posted, but that doesn't mean you can't do the same.

dang 11y ago

Ok, you've made your point repeatedly. In fact, you've posted 17 comments in this thread. That's over the top, even without the overheated rhetoric, so please stop.

amazon_not 11y ago
Is there some particular point to tell me to stop hours after I've stopped posting? Yes, I've posted 17 comments. Each comment has been original, on topic, with a point and I've several times been thanked by the founders for raising important issues. What's the problem with being active and engaged? How on earth can that be considered over the top? I have no dog in this fight, but I'm genuinely worried something bad will happen if they continue. I'm not even alone in this point of view. Several other posters have noted the same. As to rhetoric, which part do you consider overheated, and more importantly, wrong?
- dang 11y ago
  By overheated rhetoric I meant stuff like this: "Please stop before somebody gets hurt." "If you keep this up, I bet you are going to see the insides of some American jail cells too" "you have been warned" "your whole setup has enough holes to drive a truck full of C4 through" Active and engaged is great, but I think you crossed the line (a bit) into hounding. You repeated yourself, became shrill, and seemed uncharitably to assume that no one had thought of any legal issues before your comments appeared. The founders were admirably polite and focused on the substantive aspects of what you posted, but that doesn't mean you can't do the same.