3 ms·
I would argue she is much closer than 7 feet. She is likely 4 feet tall and it appears as if she laid down, she would be a few inches away. Considering that w
by giarc 11y ago
I would argue she is much closer than 7 feet. She is likely 4 feet tall and it appears as if she laid down, she would be a few inches away.
Considering that when splitting wood you should at a minimum be wearing safety glasses, I'm pretty sure this can all be done much safer.
- cgh 11y agoNobody wears safety glasses to split wood. It's not like there are wood chips flying everywhere. I could maybe see it if you're hammering in wedges or something.
- giarc 11y agoWeigh your options... wear safety glasses or lose vision. You can't say it never happens. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311802 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311802
- echlebek 11y agoI take it you're not from a rural area. I was splitting wood when I was the age of those girls. It's not as dangerous as you make it out to be.
- giarc 11y agoI may not be from a rural area, but it doesn't take a genius to know that wearing safety glasses is simply a smart thing to do. >SUMMARY: Wood chopping is still present in many homes in rural regions. In some cases, it may lead to serious ocular injury and potential loss of vision. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311802 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311802