The problem is, if the statement is word in a very open ended manner and the firing company perceives the comments as disparaging in any way, they come after yo

The problem is, if the statement is word in a very open ended manner and the firing company perceives the comments as disparaging in any way, they come after you. The company could argue revealing they're completely replacing departments with outsourced staffing as detrimental to the company's reputation due to the stigma associated with outsourcing. They go to court and whip out multiple blog posts/forum comments/editorials to prove their point. Now you're stuck. You're helping perpetuate a damaging stigma against your former employer that negatively impacts their business reputation. Doesn't matter if it's "fact" or not. Is the fact disparaging? They might also get you on NDA violations if your NDA includes not revealing corporate staffing strategies. IAMNAL but I've been around enough to know it's possible to spin anything with an open-ended clause.