3 ms·
It's possible you've not experienced the problems that we have with web based issue trackers. That's ok. Ship may not be the right tool for you. As for all-at-
by kogir 11y ago
It's possible you've not experienced the problems that we have with web based issue trackers. That's ok. Ship may not be the right tool for you.
As for all-at-once upgrades, so far it's not been an issue. The client ignores things it doesn't understand and we've kept the server backwards compatible for the last 7 months. We expect to be able to continue to do so.
- sulam 11y agoI actually love the native part, fwiw. I've often thought that a native JIRA client could be way easier to use than their web interface. Of course they could also just invest in making their web interface much better, but native expectations are naturally very high, and a lot of the horrible UX practices we accept on the web wouldn't fly in a native environment. Essentially it would have no choice but to be better.
- andybak 11y ago> a lot of the horrible UX practices we accept on the web wouldn't fly in a native environment. I'm interested by this statement. I like to think I just web and native apps by the same standards. I've seen horrible UX in both - and great UX in both. I currently lean towards favouring web apps based purely on my feeling that I tend to get a better UI on average.
- sulam 11y agoTogether we obviously represent a pretty small sample, but I'm curious what OS you use? One of the reasons I like MacOS is because the apps are typically better designed than what I got when I used Windows or Linux as my desktop (don't get me started on Linux UIs). Don't get me wrong, I've seen some bad app UIs on the Mac -- even from Apple. The old skeuomorphic days are coming back to me as I type this and I'm still sad for them. :)