3 ms·
I guess I would be concerned about compiling to JS because you're adding another layer of abstraction on an already fussy language (when being interpreted by th
by hvs 17y ago
I guess I would be concerned about compiling to JS because you're adding another layer of abstraction on an already fussy language (when being interpreted by the browser). It's hard enough to find bugs as it is.
I'm a big fan of Haskell, too. The type system alone makes it a wonderful language to work in.
- jjs 17y agoI guess I would be concerned about compiling to JS because you're adding another layer of abstraction on an already fussy language (when being interpreted by the browser). It's hard enough to find bugs as it is. On the other hand, mechanically generating the code you've abstracted away will make sure you only get the same bugs every time. ;)