I have been working in Clojure and Clojurescript full-time for 2 years and feel blessed to have had the experience, and here is what I've taken from it: 1) It

I have been working in Clojure and Clojurescript full-time for 2 years and feel blessed to have had the experience, and here is what I've taken from it: 1) It changed how I think about programming, big time. I came from Objective-C and pre-2011 C++, and the functional paradigm blew my mind open. It is now the first habit approach I have when working in any language. 2) I really miss types. While I understand the argument about "fighting the type system", I'd still prefer to occasionally tweak my line of code to satisfy an average type system like C++ rather than deal with the lack of safety and clarity that functions with no type specification for input or output provide. I've recently started doing much more in C++, but this time the modern variant (where I'm using lambdas and the algorithm library all over the place, thanks to what Clojure taught me), and it's been a wash of relief to use my brain for things other than remembering what to feed a function I wrote days, weeks, or months ago: just let the compiler tell me, verify that I've done it right. The ability to quickly test an idea in Clojure is great, but I feel like a large dynamically-typed code base is tremendous opportunity for significant run-time problems, since no compiler has verified that a big category of easy-to-make bugs aren't in there. I'm often having to look at the actual implementation of functions that I don't want to study any more, just so I can remember what types to give them, and what to expect back from them. Run-time assertions and :pre/:post are great, but still not the same thing at all -- and verbose, and added runtime overhead. I don't consider Core.Typed to be the solution to this problem; really, this is something that should be at a core language level, and Clojure is dynamically typed, that's its ball-game, and that's fine for many folks. But I'm slowly moving on towards an exploration of static languages like OCaml, Modern C++, and others. That said, the elegance of Clojure syntax is extraordinary. I don't think it can be beat. It is a joy to use. So all languages have their unique characteristics. I've come to learn what characteristics are important to me, and adjusting my workflow and choices accordingly. But I can't imagine the programming landscape without Clojure.