I reread your article, and maybe I was being too harsh. You gave an example of a 50% flat tax (which you admitted is too high), but I think what would be more i

I reread your article, and maybe I was being too harsh. You gave an example of a 50% flat tax (which you admitted is too high), but I think what would be more interesting is to see what a progressive tax would look like to remain revenue neutral while providing a reasonable level of BI. I dont think basic income is tenable in the US without raising taxes on high income earners, perhaps significantly.