3 ms·
I have a friend who is a high school teacher, and I was shocked to learn how they evaluate him. (No idea how true this is for other schools). They compare the
by ergothus 11y ago
I have a friend who is a high school teacher, and I was shocked to learn how they evaluate him. (No idea how true this is for other schools).
They compare the standardized test scores of this years group of students with those of last year's. If these students do better than those, he must have improved, and if they do worse, he must have slacked.
Now, he'll have between 20-100 students each year. Any teacher will tell you that the variation between one year's group of students and the next is considerable. (indeed, among my teacher friends I've learned it's a major point of gossip - not individual students, but the collective lot)
This seems insane to me. Why not compare this years students with THOSE SAME STUDENTS' SCORES from last year? Or find something else less likely to be so "swingy".
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- MarcScott 11y agoWe compare this way in the UK. The same students are compared each year with the assumption that some progress will be made, and that students will eventually reached a predicted level that is set externally and based on past performance and socio-economic factors. (http://www.fft.org.uk/ http://www.fft.org.uk/) It's still ridiculous and leads to teaching-to-the-test, fiddling with data, and undue pressure on teachers and learners.