> everyone talks about legibility etc but nobody points to any study (or even pictures) on how those fonts compare under low conditions (night, rain, not illumi

> everyone talks about legibility etc but nobody points to any study (or even pictures) on how those fonts compare under low conditions (night, rain, not illuminated, headlight full on) That doesnn't seem to be quite true: > In 2004, the agency embraced Clearview, based on studies that appeared to demonstrate its superiority, especially in nighttime driving tests. Granted, mentioning studies generally is different to pointing to specific studies, but still it seems clear that exactly the issues you raise are of concern.