You're right. I am not trying to argue that McCain-Feingold is constitutional. Rather, I'm trying to point out that a literal interpretation of the constituti

You're right. I am not trying to argue that McCain-Feingold is constitutional. Rather, I'm trying to point out that a literal interpretation of the constitution in this case is invalid. It's a simplistic argument that sounds good at first but doesn't hold up under critical analysis. I just did some recent edits to better express my point of view.