4 ms·
I see no mention of systemic checks and balances or corruption investigation further than a couple of bad actors. So yeah cover it up replace it with something
by stonemetal 11y ago
I see no mention of systemic checks and balances or corruption investigation further than a couple of bad actors. So yeah cover it up replace it with something hopefully less corrupt, but not what needs to happen to prevent it from happening again.
- maxerickson 11y agoI'm trying to establish some common ground. When I read something like this: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/year-in-review/20100221_Camden_police_scandal_has_widespread_consequences.html http://www.philly.com/philly/news/year-in-review/20100221_Ca... I see the "federal investigation" as a systemic action, and I don't really see how disbanding the old department is a cover up, it's a pretty real consequence.
- stonemetal 11y agoAction after it makes the evening news, not an on going part of the system that is actually capable of changing it. > how disbanding the old department is a cover up, it's a pretty real consequence. Consequence to who? Not the corrupt officers who weren't the scapegoat, all they had to do was re-apply for their old job.