3 ms·
For general cases, I agree that 200 MBs isn't enough to consider very important nowadays, but I still don't get how we're automatically talking about language p
by 59nadir 11y ago
For general cases, I agree that 200 MBs isn't enough to consider very important nowadays, but I still don't get how we're automatically talking about language productivity being a trade-off. Is the assumption that Python is a more productive language regardless of what it stands against?
- lmm 11y agobtilly was talking about the disk space as if it were important. My opinion is that Python is more productive than Lua, but if you disagree by all means use Lua. But if you're talking about saving 200mb of disk space as though it makes the difference, then I think you're using the wrong criteria for choosing your language.