3 ms·
The letter doesn't seem to be saying the tests don't work, or that they're vaporware. It is only finding "noncompliance". Looking at the first item, "Hematology
by Uhhrrr 11y ago
The letter doesn't seem to be saying the tests don't work, or that they're vaporware. It is only finding "noncompliance". Looking at the first item, "Hematology" (https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1215 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1215), it could just be that one of the conditions here (https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1269 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1269) wasn't met. Those look pretty easy to fix!
Of course, yes, there could also be all sorts of crazy sketchy voodoo. Ya never know.
- such_a_casual 11y agoThere is more than this recent fiasco to back up the person you're replying to: http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/11/new-study-spills-doubt-on-some-fingerprick-blood-tests/ http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/11/new-study-spills-doub...
- Uhhrrr 11y agoInteresting, I hadn't seen that! But even if it only works for finding herpes and other there-or-not infections, they still might justify their valuation.