5 ms·
I'm kind of tired of paying for a service that has so many outages.
by debacle 11y ago
I'm kind of tired of paying for a service that has so many outages.
- michaelhoffman 11y agoWhat's your service level agreement?
- debacle 11y agoA bitbucket license is $10. Paying $50 a month is redonk.
- placeybordeaux 11y agoWhats your service level agreement?
- foobarbecue 11y agoI liked that question better with the apostrophe.
- thebouv 11y agoWhat?s your service level agreement'
- dreamcompiler 11y agoFree for small teams. Even closed-source projects.
- beat 11y agoGo to bitbucket, or self-host, or find some other shiny new competitor. The market speaks with its feet.
- debacle 11y agoWe're already planning a bitbucket move. Unfortunately it's not planned for another week or two.
- beat 11y agoHaving used both, I find github's tools (mostly) better. And bitbucket isn't 100% reliable either.
- debacle 11y agoSelf-hosted is.
- gsteinb88 11y agoAssuming you pay someone to maintain it, maybe. Which costs a lot more than a github/bitbucket contract.
- beat 11y agoSelf-hosted isn't 100% reliable either. Nobody is that good. I've done serious high availability (financial system that would land on the front page of the New York Times the way Github lands on HN), and it wasn't 100%. And the overhead of high availability is incredible. No way would I do self-hosted version control. I have better things to do than babysit servers for commodity services.
- mitchtbaum 11y ago"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." I can learn from my mistakes and improve progressively. If I rely on another instead, I cannot, and I cannot (necessarily and confidently) see to it that they learn from their mistakes and improve. By relying on another (at least an unreliable \ uncommunicative \ uncooperative one), I cannot improve my chances of them not making those same mistakes again, taking me down with them.
- tvvocold 11y ago