3 ms·

> "because you're more likely to win with this move" Is that not exactly how a human decides which move to play?

• DonaldFisk 11y ago
  Good go players have a lot of explicit knowledge, and give names to the concepts they have. See http://senseis.xmp.net/?ReferenceSection http://senseis.xmp.net/?ReferenceSection When playing, they have a strategy, which they could explain to other go players. They don't just recognize patterns or do brute-force look-ahead. The same is true for good chess players.
• mikeash 11y ago
  There's typically an extra layer (or more) with humans. "Because this puts your Bishop in wasabi which makes it harder for your opponent to extract his Kinglet, making it more likely to win."
  • gohrt 11y ago
    Deep nets have layers too. We need to assign names to the nodes of the layers. That's the challenge of interpretability in neural nets.
    • jibalt 11y ago
      Explanations for choices have nothing to do with nodes or layers.
• jibalt 11y ago
  No, it isn't, exactly or inexactly.