> Not sure what "underfunded" means here. Thunderbird works. Email isn't evolving like the web is, so what point is there for Mozilla to throw resources at it?

> Not sure what "underfunded" means here. Thunderbird works. Email isn't evolving like the web is, so what point is there for Mozilla to throw resources at it? If you look at the arguments people can give against a switch Thunderbird, they make valid points on some lacking features, that terrible solutions like Outlook do have. This is a problem since in some places they force people to use proprietary solutions for email based on these arguments. >Typical attitude in open source software: the more free something is, the more entitled people feel about it. Can you really make that judgment? Many people have felt the same way about Mozilla's actions for a while. People who donate and contribute to free software. People who may have found inexcusable the lies about the money agreement on Pocket, among many other things. If you think these people are all spoiled brats, then good for you. >What this has to do with Push Notifications is anybodies guess. The initial comment was using this to justify that "Mozilla does remember their values". This is part of browsers improvements to stay competitive, not so much about value.