4 ms·
That's a great idea, thank you. A little ashamed I overlooked it, actually :/ It'll be thrown in with my other to-do's for the day.
by tuvalie 11y ago
That's a great idea, thank you. A little ashamed I overlooked it, actually :/ It'll be thrown in with my other to-do's for the day.
- gkya 11y agoNo problem, even the no-js users overlook it, including myself...
- tuvalie 11y agoHi, gkya. The noscript element has been added. Based on some other feedback I've received here, I also reduced the font size and line width for encyclopedic information display. (It may require a hard reload to notice the difference.) Since you had a positive impression of the original design, it'd be good to hear that it hasn't changed with the update. And thanks again!
- gkya 11y agoChecked it, yes, I see the noscript message. I rather like a more plain style for web pages that is based on text rather than icons, but it is personal preference. The font size is better, and it zooms in and out nicely (I zoom out on it for easier reading). If I would change one thing, that'd be to use a serif for some longer text. You're welcome, and kudos again.