3 ms·
it's looks like just control panel for all your clouds. If you have only aws, i don't see any profit of using this.
by serg33v 11y ago
it's looks like just control panel for all your clouds. If you have only aws, i don't see any profit of using this.
- antongribok 11y agoAs your business grows at some point it may be cheaper to run your own cloud (OpenStack or something else), and you can start migrating your workloads with a PaaS layer like this. At my previous employer the loaded TCO for running in-house OpenStack was 45-50% of AWS (the company used both).
- dmourati 11y agoAre you sure about that? Did you factor in power?
- antongribok 11y ago"Loaded TCO" means gear, space, power, cooling, transit, people... Those are high-level, and I don't remember a bunch of things that went into the 5-year TCO model but it was complex. If you have the talent and scale it's certainly doable, and like I said, we were at less than half of AWS. There are plenty of examples, one that comes to mind that is NOT hyper-scale is Server Fault.
- SureshG 11y agoIMO, it is more than that. It allows you to model your application (currently supports these software stacks http://oneops.com/integrations.html#software http://oneops.com/integrations.html#software) in a cloud agnostic way and manages it's life-cycle