3 ms·
BPG is basically HVEC, so why not just use HVEC? its a serious question, in 2 years HVEC decoders will be in all hardware. Which means fast, energy efficient d
by KaiserPro 11y ago
BPG is basically HVEC, so why not just use HVEC?
its a serious question, in 2 years HVEC decoders will be in all hardware. Which means fast, energy efficient decoders on virtually all platforms.
Having a seperate codec, which is basically a less capable version of an industry standard, whats the point? (ignoring the still images part for a second.)
- beefman 11y agoHEVC, yes. But is a BPG animation the same as an HEVC video, or is it a sequence of BPG frames? The BPG standard[1] says P-slices are used, but not B-slices... [1] sec 3.3 http://bellard.org/bpg/bpg_spec.txt http://bellard.org/bpg/bpg_spec.txt
- KaiserPro 11y agoright, how is that useful? thats my point, how does that give you something more useful than HVEC it's self.